Multi-horizon stock ratings

Don't let a trade become an investment by accident.

Every stock gets three ratings — Swing, Mid and Long — because a two-week trade and a five-year hold are different questions.

No card required. No sign-up wall to look around.
Create an account to connect a real brokerage, sync across devices, and get alerts.

NVDANvidia Corp.
96% confidence
Swing
91
Top-Tier
Mid
88
Top-Tier
Long
71
Strong
Strong momentum & relative strength · valuation stretched
Same stock, held longer
71
vs. 91 for a two-week swing
Top 500+ U.S. stocks covered
10 published factors per rating
3 independent horizons per stock
0 hidden weights in the score itself
01 · Three horizons

Same stock. Three ratings.

Each score is computed independently. A stock doesn't inherit its Long rating from its Swing rating — which is why the three often disagree, and why the disagreement is worth reading.

  • Each horizon weighted for what actually predicts returns at that timeframe
  • Percentile-ranked against the covered universe, recalculated every run
  • A confidence figure alongside every score, not just the number itself
research · swing / mid / long
StockSWMIDLNG
MSTR745231
KO445876
ABBV578579
AAPL627884
The number you're missing

When the three disagree, that's the signal

A 91 Swing and a 71 Long isn't a contradiction — it's momentum running ahead of valuation. Mintr shows you which of those two you're looking at before you commit capital to the wrong one.

  • All three high — the case holds at every timeframe you might hold it
  • Swing high, Long low — a trade with an exit, not a position to sit in
  • Long high, Swing low — a thesis you may be early to
nvda · horizon spread
91Swing
88Mid
71Long
KO runs the other way — 44 Swing, 58 Mid, 76 Long. Nothing to trade this fortnight; a different question if you're holding it for years.
02 · Ten open factors

Every score, decomposed to what built it

No composite number without a reason. Click any score and see the ten pillars behind it — price-driven and fundamentals-driven, weighted differently at every horizon.

  • Technical, momentum, and relative strength for trading horizons
  • Quality, valuation, and growth for the long-term case
  • The weighting priority disclosed by horizon, not just the total
nvda · long · pillar breakdown
Valuation
41
Growth
93
Quality
88
Balance sheet
76
Analyst
67
Sentiment
58
03 · Ask in plain English

Ask a question, get an answer grounded in the ratings

MintAI reads the same published scores you can see yourself, then explains them in plain language. It describes what the numbers say. It never quietly becomes the thing setting them.

  • Answers cite the actual rating and pillar behind every claim
  • Commentary explains a deterministic score, never overrides one
  • Works across your watchlist, holdings, or any covered stock
mintai
Which stocks look good in Technology
Ranked by Mid-horizon score, five technology names sit in the Top-Tier band. Every figure below is the published percentile rank — open any of them to see the ten pillars that produced it.
SymbolNameMidBand
MUMicron Technology97Top-Tier
SNOWSnowflake96Top-Tier
MDBMongoDB95Top-Tier
SNDKSandisk94Top-Tier
TEAMAtlassian94Top-Tier

A ranking of published factors, not a view on what to buy.

04 · Portfolio health

See what you actually own, not just what it's worth

Connect your holdings and Mintr rolls them up into sector concentration, rating-band mix, and the positions quietly dragging the average down.

  • Connect several brokerages via Plaid and see them as one consolidated book — or skip the connection and upload a CSV, or add positions by hand — credentials never touch Mintr, tokens stay server-side
  • An overall health score across the same Swing, Mid, and Long horizons as any stock, value-weighted the same way individual ratings are banded
  • Performance charted against the S&P 500, not shown in isolation
  • Sector allocation weighted by real position size, with a rating for each sleeve, not just its weight
  • Look-through fundamentals — P/E, revenue growth, margins — rolled up as if the portfolio were one company
  • ETFs and mutual funds sit in the roll-up priced, not rated — a fund has no fundamentals to score
  • Guest mode works fully — no account required to try it
my portfolio · health
Portfolio health
78Strong
1-year, vs S&P 500
+18.2% vs +11.4%
Technology 54
34%
Healthcare 62
24%
Other (6) 49
42%
43.5x
P/E
+27.3%
REV GROWTH
59.9%
GROSS MGN
26.4%
NET MGN
Measured against the market

Not by itself

A return figure on its own tells you almost nothing. Every portfolio chart on Mintr is drawn against a benchmark, with the gap stated in points.

  • Five periods — one day through two years
  • Percent or dollars, whichever you think in
  • Benchmarked against the S&P 500, the Dow, or the Nasdaq-100
  • Consolidated across every connected account
my portfolio · performance
1M 1D 1W 1Y 2Y
+1.9% S&P 500 +3.6% · behind by 1.7pt
Portfolio +1.9% Dow +2.7% S&P 500 +3.6%
Experimental · for active traders

Mintr Screeners: rule-based strategy screens

Six published, mechanical screens with disclosed historical backtests, sitting apart from the core ratings by design. If active trading isn't your thing, you'll never need to open this.

Alpha Core Alpha Elite Confluence Kinetic Resonance Rebound
mintr screeners · breakout
ABNBnear highs
AMGNnear highs
GEHCnear highs
Why trust the number

The commentary explains the rating. It never sets it.

Every score is a percentile rank computed the same way, in the open, every time. Read the full methodology, including what a score doesn't mean.

01

Deterministic, not generative

Scores come from a fixed formula applied to real data. No language model ever touches the number itself.

02

Published, not proprietary

All ten pillars and their relative weight by horizon are disclosed on the methodology page, not hidden as IP.

03

Sourced, not scraped

Fundamentals come straight from SEC EDGAR filings — the company's own numbers, not a vendor's rewrite of them.

04

Relative, honestly

A score is a rank against today's market, not a fixed grade. We say so, including what that means in a downturn.

Coverage

What we cover, what we don't, and why

A rating we can't stand behind is worse than no rating. Here's the boundary, in full, before you sign up rather than after.

S&P 500Rated
Complete. All three horizons, all ten pillars.
Dow 30Rated
Complete.
Nasdaq-100Rated · 97 of 102
Complete but for five names — ASML, CCEP, FER, PDD, TRI. All five are foreign private issuers, filing with the SEC on a different form and schedule than domestic companies, so our fundamentals pillars would be ranking them against figures that aren't equivalent. We'd rather show a blank than a number we can't defend.
Other large- and mid-capsRated · ~20 names
Beyond the three indices above, we also rate a curated set of NASDAQ- and NYSE-listed names by market cap that aren't S&P 500, Dow, or Nasdaq-100 members — the same domestic-filer standard applies, re-ranked whenever the list is revisited.
Top 50 ETFs
Top 50 mutual funds
Tracked, not rated
A fund has no balance sheet, no margins, no earnings growth — five of our ten pillars have nothing to read. Your funds appear in your portfolio with position, price, and value, but no score. We don't invent one.
Money market fundsNot covered
Cash equivalents. Nothing to rank.
About

Why we built it

Mintr came out of a working problem: most rating services answer one question, and never tell you which question they answered. So we built one that answers three, and shows its work. If a score looks wrong to you, the methodology page will show you how it was built — and you can email us and say so.

The ratings are free

You won't pay to see a score, a pillar breakdown, or your portfolio's rating.

Try it as a guest

Look up a stock you own. Thirty seconds, no account.

That's the whole product, in miniature. Then decide if you want the rest.